RANCANGAN GEOMETRI PELEDAKAN BATUAN GRANODIORIT PT. GILGAL BATU ALAM LESTARI MEMPAWAH KALIMANTAN BARAT

Murad Murad

Abstract


PT. Gilgal Batu Alam Lestari (PT. GILBAL) is a granodiorite mining company whose activities include stripping overburden, excavation/mining using the blasting method, transporting blasted materials and processing granodiorite in processing units. The blasting design parameters are influenced by the proper selection of the hole diameter and pitch height. The effect of burden, spacing, stemming, subdrilling, the depth of the shot holes is very important to anticipate the geological conditions and the type of explosives used. The purpose of this research is to study and calculate the size of rock fragmentation resulting from blasting and analyze the size distribution of fragmentation in blasting activities using the Kuz-Ram method and Split Desktop 4.0 software. The method of solving the problem in this research is to design a good blasting geometry to get the granodiotite fragmentation size < 50 cm. The proposed geometric design uses RL. Ash, CJ. Konya and ICI-Explosive. The results of the design RL. Ash obtained burden (B) 1.95 m, spacing (S) 2.34 m, steaming (T) 1.36 m, subdrilling (J) 0.585 m, blast hole depth (H) 5.85 m, ladder height ( L) 6 m, Powder column (PC) 4.49 m, hole diameter (De) 3 inches. CJ. Konya obtained B 2 m, S 2.375 m, T 1.4 m, J 0.6 m, H 5.69 m, L 6 m, PC 4.29 m, De 3 inches. According to the ICI-Explosive theory, B 1.9 m, S 1.9 m, T 1.52 m, J 0.608 m, H 6.08 m, L 6 m, PC 3.952 m, De 3 inches. The proposed design using ICI-Explosive and Kuz-ram found that the fragmentation size of 50 cm passed the 89.10% sieve and the cost of blasting was Rp. 115,237,500,-more likely to be implemented because it requires minimal blasting costs and fragmentation in accordance with the bucket capacity and company design compared to the RL. Ash method. and CJ. Konya. The distribution of fragmentation using Split Desktop obtained a fragmentation size of 50 cm which passed the sieve of 97.11%. It is necessary to conduct a more in-depth study related to the ideal blasting geometry from a technical and economic point of view as well as strict supervision of the blasting geometry design that has been designed to be implemented in the field.

Keywords


Geometry, Blasting, Fragmentation, Split Desktop 4.0, Kuz-Ram

References


Anonim. (2020). Dokumen RKAB PT. Gilgal Batu Alam Lestari, Desa Bukit Batu, Sungai Duri II Kecamatan Sungai Kunyit, Kabupaten Mempawah Propinsi Kalimantan Barat.

Ash, R. L. (1990). Design of Blasting Round, Surface Mining. BA Kennedy, Editor, Society for Mining, Metalury and Exploration.

Awang Suwandhi. (2012). Mengenal Tentang Pemberaian Batuan, Pusdiklat Teknologi Mineral dan Batubara Bandung, Bandung.

Defriansyah, A., & Yulhendra, D. (2019). Evaluasi Teknis Geometri Peledakan untuk Mendapatkan Fragmentasi dan Identifikasi Tingkat Keseragaman Batuan Hasil Peledakan yang Ideal di PT. Allied Indo Coal Jaya, Kecamatan Talawi, Kota Sawahlunto. Bina Tambang, 4(1), 100-113.

Faisal, M. A., & Yulhendra, D. (2021). Analisis Orientasi Kekar terhadap Fragmentasi Batuan Hasil Peledakan di PT. Semen Padang. Bina Tambang, 6(1), 1-13.

Frianto, R., Nurhakim, N., & Riswan, R. (2017). Kajian Teknis Geometri Peledakan Pada Keberhasilan Pembongkaran Overburden Berdasarkan Fragmentasi Hasil Peledakan. Jurnal Fisika Flux: Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika FMIPA Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 11(1), 56-67.

https://split-desktop.software.informer.com/4.0/, diakses tanggal 6 Nopember 2022.

Idowu, K. A., Olaleye, B. M., & Saliu, M. A. (2021). Application of Split Desktop Image Analysis and Kuz-Ram Empirical Model for Evaluation of Blast Fragmentation Efficiency in a Typical Granite Quarry. Ghana Mining Journal, 21(1), 45-52.

Jethro, M. A., Ogbodo, D., & Ajayi, P. (2016). Rock Fragmentation Prediction Using Kuz-Ram Model. J. Environ. Earth Sci, 6(5), 110-115.

Koesnaryo, S. (2001). Teknik Peledakan Buku I dan II.

Konya, C. J., & Walter, E. J. (1990). Surface blast design. Prentice Hall.

Lestari, S. (2013). Identifikasi Jenis-Jenis Batuan Di Kabupaten Mamuju Provinsi Sulawesi Barat (Penelitian pada Ekspedisi Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Koridor Sulawesi).

Libriyon, D. P., & Kopa, R. (2020). Evaluasi Geometri Peledakan Terhadap Fragmentasi Batuan Hasil Peledakan Digging Time Alat Gali Muat Dan Recovery Peledakan Di Pit B PT. Darma Henwa Tbk Bengalon Coal Project Kalimantan Timur. Bina Tambang, 5(1), 200-211.

Priyono, M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Sidoarjo: Zifatma Publishing

Rinaldo, R., Heriyadi, B., & Prabowo, H. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Parameter Geomekanika Batuan Terhadap Kegiatan Peledakan Pada Front Penambangan Blok A2 di CV. Triarga Nusatama, Kecamatan Lareh Sago Halaban, Kabupaten Lima Puluh Kota, Sumatera Barat. Bina Tambang, 3(3), 1163-1173.

Ramadan, S., & Kopa, R. (2018). Analisis Geometri Peledakan Guna Mendapatkan Fragmentasi Batuan yang Diinginkan untuk Mencapai Target Produktivitas Alat Gali Muat Pada Kegiatan Pembongkaran Lapisan Tanah Penutup (Overburden) di Pit Menara Utara, PT. Arkananta Apta Pratista Job Site PT. KPUC, Malinau, Kalimantan Utara. Bina Tambang, 3(4), 1523-1535.

Ridho, M., & Gusman, M. (2019). Kajian Teknis Pengaruh Fragmentasi Hasil Peledakan di PT. Semen Padang. Bina Tambang, 4(1), 424-434.

Rizani, A., Hadi, S., & Asy'ari, M. A. (2018). Modifikasi Geometri Peledakan Pada Sisi Free Face Di Area Low Wall Tambang Batubara. Poros Teknik, 10(2), 60-66.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36275/stsp.v22i2.547

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 310 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) - 104 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Murad Murad

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Penerbit : Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Industri Padang


Alamat:
Jalan Hamka no.121 Tabing Padang. Indonesia
email: info@sttind.ac.id
HP:082386758367